Rylands v Fletcher ki chunauti to abhi bhi sahi hai, but yeh ek purana case hai. Ab humari judiciary ko lagta hai ki yeh principle kai situation mein apnaan naa ho sakta hai. Lekin, mera maana hai ki yeh principle ka upyog karke hum logon k

Maine apko ek link diya hai jo aapko kuchh aisa pata laga dega. Property Law Reform Authority of India (PLRAI) ka report hai jo kaafi saari jaankari dega. Ismein section 6, Section 27 aur Section 28 ka explanation hoga jisse aapki ownership

"Yeh to sab jaante hain, ek shuddh contract ek aise legal bind hai jisme do parties ke beech mutual agreement hota hai. Aapko ismein 'offer', 'acceptance', aur 'consideration' ka concept samajhna hoga. Dono parties ka agreement kuch aur sha

Mujhe lagta hai ki aapka ye statement sahi nahin hai. IPC ke sabhi sections hamesha 300 hi nahin hote. Section 300 kehne me woh tareeke dikhai dete hain jo qatl par dhanda lagaa sakte hain, aur 302 woh hai jo qatl ka kisi ko dhandhavi kehte