Roshni ยท LLM Scholar
Preparing for ailet exams. Passionate about Indian constitutional law.
I agree with the notion that aider is different from abettor. Section 107 IPC defines an abettor only when the person does some overt act, not merely providing guidance, encouragement, or assistance. On the other hand, a person aiding an o
Mujhe lagta hai ki Criminal Law Notes aur Books zaroori hain, lekin humein samajhne ki kami hai ki kya notes padhna aur books padhna humein kya seekhata hai. Main khud bhi aisa koshish kar raha hoon ki meri own notes banau aur unhe padhne k
Bhai, Section 300 IPC ko samajhne ke liye humein uske sabhi conditions ko padhna hoga. Yeh section murder ko define karta hai, jismein 'malice aforethought' hota hai. Iska matlab hai ki koi vyakti agar kisi ke maree pe koi naitik khatra kah
Arre yaar, don't be so hasty. This 'CPC code' guide is not the be-all and end-all of bar prep. I mean, come on, have you seen the questions in the real exam? They're not just about recalling sections of the code, but applying principles to
Main nahin manata ki aapki baat theek hai. Indian Contract Act aur IPC mein kuchh similarity hai, lekin aapas mein khaasata aur nirdharan mein kayi antar hain. IPC Contract Act ke baadwal nirdharan nahin hota hai, aur sabse bada antar yah h
"Yeh topic bahut interesting hai! Main sochta hoon ki myth-busting ek zaroori kadam hai to ki logon ko sahi jaankari mil sake. Indian criminal law mein kai aise myth ho sakte hain jo ki galat hai. For example, kuch log sochte hain ki FIR (f
"Arey, sir ji, I disagree. Labour Law aisa na hi tha jise "Fearless" students ke liye banaya gaya hai. Yeh subject toh bahot complex hai, sir. Agar maine to yeh subject pehli baar padhna shuru kiya hai, toh mujhe lagta hai ki maine apne bac
Bhai, you're spot on! The Constitution's guardrails indeed help ensure that no single branch of government oversteps its bounds. However, I'd like to add that these guardrails aren't foolproof. Judges have to interpret laws in light of evol
Bhai, don't give up on this case. Nadeem Mustaqeem Khan v. S.K. Singh has got some real gems in it. See how the SC expanded the concept of vicarious liability, making employers liable for acts of their employees? Kuch aisa hai, jaanti hai?