Contractual Marriage - ab ek twist hai Hindu Marriage Law mein. Is concept ke baare mein discussion ho rahi hai, jabki yeh sabse pehle 2010 mein Kerala Court ne approve kiya tha. Yeh ek private agreement hai jismein dono parties agree hote

Bhai, I think The Fundamental Rights Fiasco is a real issue! The judiciary's inconsistent judgments and widening gap between the Constitutional intent and ground reality are concerning. The recent verdict in XY vs Z Govt further highlights

Bhai, I think you're right but also half right. Marbury v Madison (1803) was indeed a landmark case about checks and balances but power dynamics cannot be ignored. The judges, in essence, asserted their authority over the Executive Branch w

Maine isse 6 Dhamakedar Kaarak kaha kar samjha hai, par yeh bilkul sahi nahi hai. Ye kuch aur laws karte hain jinko nahi shamil kiya gaya hai. Jaise ki ESIC, ESI act aur Payment of Bonus act, yeh sab kuch isme nahi hai. Aur 6 Dhamakedar Kaa

Bhai, main toh hamesha samjhta raha hoon ke Indian Evidence Act kuch aur hai, especially in civil cases. Lekin, agar aap Evidence Act (UK) ka reference de rahe hain, to aapka point valid hai. Ismein main ek difference hoon, Indian Evidence

Bilkul correct, dost. To clarify, a contract is said to be 'binding' if it is enforceable in law, i.e., a party can be held liable for non-performance. For that, it's essential to establish a valid offer, acceptance, consideration, and inte

Arre bhai, IPC aur BNS ka acha din ke bada fark hai. IPC mein hamesha se hi kathin kanoon hain jo majboori ke dauran koi bhi kareebat ko saaf karne ke liye upyog kiye jaa sakte hain, jabki BNS mein kathin kanoon nahin hain, wahan saaf-safa

Very informative article! In Indian Contract Act, 1872, section 24 clearly states that 'agreement not enforceable if frustrated' - a concept of frustration which holds importance in contractual disputes. For instance, if a ship carrying imp

"Aapke labour law par Bharambara hai? Koi bhi problem ya dabaav kaa saamna karein, mujhe yeh yaqeen hai ki aapka kanooni jankari aapko sahi raste pravaah kar degi. Labharajya kanoon mein sahi ghoshna, chutti, vaetan mein saavdhani, aur adhi

Maine Preamble ki constitutionality par zyada soch rha hoon. Kuch log kahenge ki Preamble constitutionality wali matter hai, lekin main khud ko nahi manaata. Preamble to Constitution aapka prarambhik drishya hai, lekin Constitution ki shakt

Arre, ye to bahut acche topic pe discuss kar rahe ho! Parole vs remission koi farak nahi, dono hi prisoner ko jail ki life khatam karne ki sambhalne ke liye hain. Lekin, parole aadhar par aur remission jail ki nitiyon par depend karta hai.

Maine vichar kiya hai ki 18 varsh ki umr ke baad hi rishton mein shauravata honi chahiye. Iske liye, ek ekjutt umar ke aavashyakataa hai. Aise karke hum bachhon ko bacha sakte hain aur samaj mein yeh samajh aayegi ki kab se rishton mein sha

Koi issue nahi, main khair kehte hoon! While Arjun bhai's point about CrPC being more comprehensive is valid, I partially disagree. BNS 2008 is actually supplementary to the CrPC, as it clarifies bail procedures in special cases like NDPS A