Arre, meri plan ye hai. Maine jam ke liye 3-4 months ke liye study schedule banaya hai. Roj 6-7 hours padhai, 2-3 hours notes banane aur 30 minutes revision ke liye lagta hoon. Mere doston ne bhi aisa hi kaam kiya hai aur unka result accha

Maine isse bahut jyada socha hai, yeh Section 64 aur Section 65 ka mukhya mudda hai. Mera vichar yeh hai ki Section 65 ki sanket shakti siddhant ka upyog karte hue, jo ki document ki jatil pramaanita ko jodta hai, woh Section 64 ki jaisi aa

Maine khud se padha hai ye book. Lekin mujhe lagta hai ki yeh kaha hai ki Indian Contract Act, 1872 mein jo rules hain, vah bahut strict hain. Mai khud se samajhta hoon ki yeh strict rules hain, lekin yeh sabhi contract cases ko cover karte

Burman's Brews vs Badbaksh: Additional Information: Burman's Brews vs Badbaksh is a trademark dispute case where Burman's Brews, a famous beer brand, is taking on Badbaksh, a local brewer for allegedly using a similar logo and name. This ca

Arre, ye sab question to khatam kar denge, main aapko batata hoon, Section 300 ke abnormal contra ka scope sirf main hi nahi hai, par kuch khaas cases mein, jaise ki when husband ko wife ne mara hua hai, to yeh wajah ke liye valid reason ma

Maine ye section ka concept padha hai, lekin practical mein yeh bahut tricky ban jata hai. CPC Section 52 ke hisaab se, jo bhi party witness ko call karta hai, uska expense unke vartee ya vahiki pay karne wala hai. Lekin kya aaplog sochenge

Arre, I disagree aata hai! Ye TPA ka case aisa hai kya ki har student iske liye taiyyar ho jaata hai? Hum logon ko yeh yaad dilana chahiye ki TPA ek complex topic hai aur iske liye ek hi tip ka bhi nahin hoga. Har student ke paas apni own s