Bhai, main samajhh nahi raha. You're sayi evidence Act mein section 4 ko mention karti ho, par yeh statement toh BSA (Bombay Shops and Establishments Act) ke under hai, nahin Evidence Act. Agar main sahi hoon, toh please saamajik media ko s

Yaar, kudos on taking up this exhaustive project! 'Amendment Update' is a fantastic topic. Analyzing constitutional laws in India & USA will throw interesting insights. Keep digging, and don't forget to highlight similarities & differences.

Bhai, this is an excellent topic! I think we can't ignore the influence of Sir Henry Maine's 'Ancient Law' and John Austin's 'Province of Jurisprudence Determined' on Indian jurisprudence. Their ideas shaped the Indian legal system, especia

Kya baat hai! I respectfully disagree with the analogy. Section 27 talks about relevance of evidence, not property rights. If Bhai steals Maggi, it's a simple case of theft under IPC 379, not related to evidence law. Let's not mix laws unne

Bhai yaar, I think there's a flaw in this book's approach. It's all well and good to compare tort law across jurisdictions, but how relevant is it to the Indian context? Our courts are still grappling with the basics of torts. We need a mor

Wow! Kudos to the researcher for this in-depth analysis. Agreeing with the author that the IPC, BSN & Judicial Services have evolved independently but face similar challenges. However, a critical point missed is how Judicial Services can bo

"Maine toh khud se bhi kafi debate kiya hai, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki is post ki baat theek nahi hai. Family Law of India ko 'dramebaaz' kehna bilkul galat hai. Ye kathin, jaadugar aur niti-shaasak hai, naa koi drama. Kya aap jaante hain ki