Wow, such a classic case! I love how the SC clarified the 'public purpose' doctrine in this case. Can't agree more with the majority verdict. It's high time we revisit the concept of 'public purpose' in the context of modern economic policy

Bhai, family court ka range family cases me hai, jaise divorce, maintenance, custody, adoption aur child marriage ka. Woh sabhi cases jo khandaani masle se judte hain, family court ka samna karte hain. Unke paas family court act ke anusaar

Section 302 IPC, abetment to murder, koi aisa nahi hota. Accomplice bhi hai, lekin woh jo murder karne ki planning kar raha tha, uska role aur punishment alag se alag hota hai. Abetment to murder, woh abhi bhi section 302 ka hi part hai, le

Arrest v/s Summons: Kaun Siya Baazi, ek interesting topic hai. Main tanaav vajud hai koi bhi person arrest ho sakta hai jab police ko feeling hoti hai ki woh ek crime kar raha hai. Lekin, summons ek warning hai, jisme person ko court mein j

Main kahaa nahi hai ki police custody remand ek zaroori baat hai, par ye baat bhi dikhayi jaati hai ki ismein inhuman treatment ho sakti hai. Section 167, 309, aur 313 ke under remand prapt hone ke baad bhi, agar police ki galtiyan nai hote