The Arnab Goswami Case: A Reversal of Article 15?

So, you guys know the Arnab Goswami case, right? Essentially, it was like the plot of Article 15 but reversed. Goswami sued the Maharashtra government for allegedly orchestrating a conspiracy to frame him. But then, a Bombay High Court bench, led by Justice S J Kathawalla, refused to grant him interim relief. The reasoning? He didn't provide sufficient proof of a 'conspiracy' to back up his allegations. It was a major setback for Goswami, who had been vocal about his criticism of the Maharashtra government.

So, what do you guys think? Was the HC right in not granting interim relief to Goswami? Do you think he had a strong case? Or was it just a case of 'kutta bhi hai, kutte ke hain'?