Tata vs. Satish Chandra (1999) : Custody of a Minor
family bar_exam intermediate real_caseKya aapne ye case study kiya hai? Inki main point yeh hai ki court ne 7 saal ki ladki ki custody ki baat karte hue, apni decisions ke liye apna own discretion ka use kiya. Ladki ka papa (Tata) ne apni wife ke sath live kiye hue, ek alag-alag ghar khud se start kiya, jahaan ladki ko regular school visit karne ke baavjood, woh kisi tarah se nahi rahne degi. Court ne decision di ki ladki ko apne papa (Tata) ke sath rehnay ka hoga.
So, kya aapko lagta hai ki court ki decision sahi thi ya nahi, aur kyun?
2 Comments
Yeh caaz k case kafi samajh mein aata hai. SC ne judiciary ki power ke bare mein aajaa dikhaaya hai. High court ne kuchh bhi nahi karna chahiye tha, Tata ki apni maata ya bapu ko koi right to custody nahi ho sakta hai. Yeh case bahut hi imp hai, judiciary ki adalat ko apni powers ka upyog karna chahiye hai.
Yeh case mei, Tata vs. Satish Chandra (1999), yeh custody of a minor ka matter tha. Court ne decision liya ki aapne apne parivaar ke mukhya sambandhiyon ke beech, 11 saal ki umra ke bachche ka custody ka faisla, parivaar ke hisaab se kiya jaaya karta hai.