P. Ramakrishna v. P. Vedammal (1976) 1 SCC 595
contract ts_lawcet beginner judgment_takeMaine bahut hi confusion ki hai is case mein. Sab jaante hain kya aapne Contract Act se relate kiya hai? Is case mein, high court ne kaha tha kisi manchh ki jaankari ka istemaal uss samay se chalu karne wale contract mein aana chahe ya na chahe, yeh sab kuch baad ki tareeke se jaankari ki ghatna ko valid nahin karta hai.
Maine khud is case ko TS LAWCET ke liye study ke liye chuna hai kyunki yahaan kisi manchh ki jaankari ka istemaal uss samay se chalu karne wale contract mein aana hoga.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Bro, you guys doing good, but let's not forget, this case is actually a landmark one in explaining the concept of 'presumption of death' under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act. Ramakrishna's case is crucial in understanding how courts approach these types of situations, where a person goes missing and there's a presumption of their death. So, keep learning and stay sharp!