Niranjan Vikramsinghji Khubchandani & Ors vs. State of Maharashtra (2003)

So, I was revising for Property Law and I stumbled upon this case. In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled that a sale deed with a wrong description of the plot size can still be considered valid if the actual area is not significantly different from the mentioned area. In this case, the plot size was mentioned as 12,000 sq. ft. but only 8,000 sq. ft. actually existed. The SC said kya, it's okay as the difference is not substantial. But what if the difference is like 10,000 sq. ft.?

Now, guys, what's your take on this? Do you think the SC's judgment was justified or was it a loophole? Should we be teaching TPA in this way to our students? Your thoughts please, MH CET Law aspirants?