Nandini Satish vs Union of India: A Landmark Judgment

I'm still fuming about this one, folks. Nandini Satish vs Union of India (2020) was a case where the Supreme Court decriminalized adultery in private marriages. But the implications on women's rights are still up for debate. The SC ruled that adultery laws were unconstitutional, but didn't entirely lift the ban on adultery in Hindu marriages. To me, this means the court still holds women responsible for their spouse's infidelity. The judgment highlights the need for a gender-neutral approach to laws on marriage and family. As a law student, I'd say CUET PG Law aspirants need to be aware of this nuance, especially when analyzing family law and women's rights in their papers. What's your take on this complex issue?