Mirza Mohammed Fazlur Rahman v/s The State of West Bengal (1968)

Yeh case bahut hi important hai for Evidence Act. In 1968, SC ruled that if the FIR is recorded with the intention of falsely framing someone, then the FIR can be considered as null and void, and the evidence collected from it can't be used against the accused. Judge Sikri ki baat thi ki FIR ki authenticity ko check karna bahut hi zaroori hai, and if it's tampered with, then the whole case goes down the drain!

So, CLAT PG/AILET PG students, what do you think of this judgment? Do you agree that a tainted FIR can sabotage the whole case? Or do you think justice should be served even if the FIR is flawed?