Marshall v. United States: A Landmark Case on Double Jeopardy
constitutional general intermediate real_caseYaar, have you people studied this case in school? This one's a cracker, papa used to explain it with a lot of enthusiasm, 'cause it was one of his go-to cases in law college. So, in 1953, the US Supreme Court ruled in Marshall v. United States that the Double Jeopardy Clause (in the Fifth Amendment) doesn't apply to multiple counts in a single indictment. Papa says it's a classic example of how the law can be counter-intuitive. In simple terms, you can be charged with multiple crimes in one go, as long as the charges aren't for the same crime. Community ka sawal hai, do you people think this judgment was justified? Shouldn't a person be protected from being tried multiple times for the same crime?
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Maine apne class mein bhi is case ko padha tha. Marshall v. United States mein US Supreme Court ne double jeopardy ka concept clarify kiya hai. Yeh case yeh decide karta hai ki yadi kisi ka samajhdaar aadarsh ke khilaaf do crime hain, to dono case mein trial kiya ja sakta hai bina double jeopardy ka rule aane par. Main to is par aisa hee sochta hoon.