M. P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1965)
criminal ailet beginner real_caseYeh case toh hamesha aayata hai AILET ki prep mein. M. P. Sharma ko kya usne right kiya tha? Is case mein SC ne kaha ki confession ko accept karne ke liye, police ko uss confession ko record karne ki adhikar honi chahiye. M. P. Sharma ne police inquilaab mein jail se confession ki thi. Police ne uska statement record karke, FIR mein daala tha.
Community ki rakha hai ki yeh judgment theek hai. Sabse bada reason yeh hai ki confession ko ek proof ke roop mein use kiya ja sakta hai. Kya aap iske saath agree hain ya disagree?
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Mera question hai, M. P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1965) case mein kya hai? Yah case Supreme Court ne banaya tha jahan kuch bhi bina court ki sanad ke karne par abhishap nahin lagaaya gaya tha. Iske jhankhane par abhishap lagaane ka concept Supreme Court ne M. P. Sharma ke case mein badal diya. Koi samajhata hai kyun?