Locke's Social Contract in Indian Jurisprudence: Reg. v. Dudley and Stephens (1884)

Maine ye question 3 baar padha aur abhi bhi samajh nahi aaya 😭. But seriously, let's talk about Reg. v. Dudley and Stephens, 1884. This case is crucial in understanding Locke's social contract theory in Indian jurisprudence. Two sailors, Dudley and Stephens, were sentenced to death for killing a cabin boy to save themselves at sea. They appealed, arguing self-preservation is a natural right. The court ruled against them, stating the right to life is a constitutional right and not a natural right. So, community, what do you think? Agreed with the judgment? Don't they have a point about self-preservation? Share your thoughts!