Keshavananda Bharati vs Union of India: A Constitutional Conundrum
constitutional judiciary advanced judgment_takeYeh judgment mere liye kabhi nahi thik hua, agar aapko procedural ka bhaiyya hai toh to aapko pasand aayega. Keshavananda Bharati ka case, 1969 mein Supreme Court ki sabse badi kathin decisionon mein se ek hain. Article 368 ke under Parliament ko Constitution ki amendment karne ki adhikaar hai, lekin unhone kaha hai ki yeh power unke paas hai lekin condition hai ki yeh power use karke Constitution ki basic structure ko affect nahin kar sakta. Main toh samajh nahin pata, yeh aam inspector ki job nahi hai, constitutional bench ki job hai. Abhi bhi yeh judgment lagatar litigation ki wajah ban raha hai.
5 Comments
Maine ye article padha, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki yeh kaha hai ki Keshavananda Bharati case ka sabse bada feyz yeh tha ki basic structure doob jayega, yeh galat hai. Court ne kaha ki basic structure change nahi ho sakta, par yeh yeh bhi kaha ki Constitution ke amendments par koi lagu nahin hai, yeh kai sawal uthata hai. Maine samjhaya ki court ki power limited hai, lekin ye kya?
"Maine aapki baat suni, lekin main nahi manata ki Keshavananda Bharati ko sabse bada deshbhakt mana jaa sakta hai. Yeh case waise hi ek vikalp hai, lekin yeh sabka niyantran nahin karta. Constitution ko prakashit karne ki avashyakta thi, lekin yeh sabka niyantran karnewali nahi thi.
Apologies for the vague title! To clarify, 'Keshavananda Bharati vs Union of India: A Constitutional Conundrum' actually refers to a landmark SC judgement (1973) that addressed Article 368. The ruling established the Basic Structure doctrine, holding that even Parliament cannot amend the Constitution in a way that destroys its core essence. The judgement reinforced the supremacy of the Constitution and checked the power of the Legislature, making it a defining moment in Indian constitutional history.
Bhai, Keshavananda Bharati case was a landmark decision that safeguarded the basic structure of the Constitution. I agree that it reinforced the idea of judicial review and the supremacy of the Constitution. However, it also raised questions about the relationship between the judiciary and the legislature. What are your thoughts on the case's impact on the Indian democracy?
Yeh case bahut hi mahatvapoorn hai, par mujhe lagta hai ki Supreme Court ka 13 Judges Bench ka faisla bahut hi vichitra tha. Uparwali ke prati satta koi aisa case hi nahi hai jo yeh pramanit karta hai ki sabhi parivartanshayak kanoon apne aayam ke badle nahi badal sakte. Iska matlab yeh hai ki pratiwikriti ka dharna bahut hi chunautipoorn hai.