Kesavananda Bharati v. India (1973) - Bharat ki Identity ka Case!
constitutional judiciary intermediate real_caseYe case bahut hi important hai Judicial Services ke liye, kyonki yahaan Supreme Court ne Article 368 ki interpretation ki, jo ka Bharat ki Constitution ko amend karne ka power diya hai. Lekin, Bharati ji ke paas is power ki limit ka sawal hai, to kya woh Constitution ki esential features ko chodon chal sakte hain ya nahin? Bahut saari debate thi, kya Bharat ki Identity ko maintain karne ke liye is power ka upyog kar sakte hain ya nahin? Ab aap logon ki baat hai, kya aap is judgment se sahanoshte hain ya nahin? Abhi comment kijiye!
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Main yeh case bahut interest hai, kyonki yeh Bharat ki konstitushanal vichardhara ko badalne ki koshish ki ghati thi. Bharatiya janata ki identiti ka samna karne ke liye yeh case bahut bada wasool tha. Lekin main kisi bhi tareeke se desh ko todne ki koshish se nirasha hoon, yeh Bharat ki shashakti ko kamjor nahi karta.
Maine padha hai yeh case aur yeh bahut zaroori hai. Kesavananda Bharati ka case 42nd Amendment ke against tha, jo ki Article 368 ko amend kar sakta tha. Court ne yeh decision di ki Parliament ko Article 368 main koi bhi change nahi karna chahiye. Yeh case Bharat ki identity ko samjhaata hai ki constitution ka mool element kaunsa hai. Agree karta hoon iske point par!