When Your Phone Dies, I Think of Best Evidence Rule
evidence ailet intermediate law_vs_lifeI know it sounds weird, but whenever my phone's battery dies, I remember the Best Evidence Rule. You see, Section 65 of the Evidence Act says that the best evidence that can be produced available must be used, not the secondary or tertiary source. It's like when I've saved a WhatsApp conversation with my friend, and my phone dies before I can print it. The printout is the best evidence, not the screenshot or the WhatsApp conversation itself. Simple, right? But trust me, when you're preparing for AILET, you want to remember this one. It's not just about a dead phone, it's about understanding the law of evidence and applying it to real-life situations. Who knew a dead phone battery could be a law lesson in disguise?
2 Comments
I don't get this comparison. Just because my phone died and I couldn't check witnesses' statements doesn't mean I apply the Best Evidence Rule. It's about court evidence, not my phone battery life. Can't we keep the two separate? It's like analogizing tort law to my pizza delivery experience - just doesn't compute.
"Agar aapko bhi yeh lagta hai ki phone ki mrityu aur Best Evidence Rule ka koi sambandh hai, toh main aapko yaad dilana chahta hoon ki Best Evidence Rule, jo IPC Section 62 mein diya gaya hai, ek mahatvapoorn prashn ka jawab deti hai - kabhi-kabhi ek shakya pramukh (dubious evidence) ko pramukh pramukh (principal evidence) se aazaad rakhna sahi hai