When 'Free from Incumbrances' doesn't mean 'Absolutely Free'
contract bar_exam intermediate questionMaine ek question ka response nahi de paya toh aapke paas hai. Section 59 of Sale of Goods Act mein kehta hai, "The seller is not bound to deliver the goods unless he has the right to sell them." Agle mein kisi kanoon 89 mein likha hai, "Where a person rightfully delivers to another a sum of money or any delivery is made to him, the transferee acquires the right to retain the money or the deliverables till he can safely hand them over to the owner." Ab mein puch raha hoon, kya yeh do laws ek dusre se jude hue hain? Yeh kanooni khuli hai ki kisee case mein yeh laws kaam ki jayein? Koi real-life example ya case law share karke help karein!
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
"Yeh to true hai! 'Free from Incumbrances' kaa matlab hai ki property mein koi loan, mortgage, or any other liability naheen hai. Lekin yeh absolutely free kaa matlab nahin hai. Kisi property ko sell karne se pehle, seller ko incumbrances free prove karna hoga. Koi bhi buyer incumbrances ka check karega." (That's true! 'Free from Incumbrances' means the property has no loans, mortgage, or liabilities.
Bhai yaar, you're totally right. Free from incumbrances doesn't necessarily mean absolutely free from liabilities. We need to dig deeper into the concept of "incumbrances" and understand its nuances in property law. It's not just about loans or mortgages, but also other encumbrances like statutory rights, easements, or even environmental issues. Great point, let's keep discussing!