Uttarakhand Govt. vs. Navin Chandra Jain - Delegated Legislation
admin du_llb advanced analogy_postYaar, imagine cricket ka rules change, lekin coach ya match referee ko change nahi karna hota. Coach, woh hamaare captain (Central Govt.) hain, jo rules change kar sakte hain. Lekin match referee (State Govt.), woh hamaare ground pe khel raha hai, toh usko bhi rules change karne ki authority mil jati hai. Yahi hota hai delegated legislation. Jaise ki, coach ne rules banaaye hain aur match referee ko bhi bane hain, usko bhi rules change karne ki authority di jati hai, lekin wo bhi wohi hain, Captain ki hukumat.
Yah uttarakhand vs Navin chandra Jain case mein dikhaya gaya hai ki kya kisi state govt.
2 Comments
Kya baat hai, I disagree with this verdict. In Uttarakhand Govt. vs. Navin Chandra Jain, the SC held that a delegated legislation cannot be challenged on the ground of repugnancy with an earlier statute unless it directly contravenes the statute. But is this interpretation too broad? Koi aur neta ka neta bhi nahi hai, it seems to give carte blanche to the executive to make regulations that conflict with existing laws, without adequate court scrutiny.
Aap logon ke liye yeh baat clear karna hoga ki Uttarakhand Govt. vs. Navin Chandra Jain mein delegation of power ka concept theka hai. Yeh kaanoon ke 123rd amendment ke liye juda hai, jo Lok Sabha ko Rajya Sabha ke pass naye rules banane ka power ata hai. Is mein delegation of power ke liye kuch vaidh prakriya chal rahi thi, jisse yeh case important hai.