Understanding Vicarious Liability through IPL's Franchise Model

Imagine you're a junior player in the IPL, but somehow your coach's reckless behavior on the field gets you into a fistfight with the opposition. The question arises: can the franchise (BCCI, in this case) be held liable for your coach's actions? In CPC, vicarious liability works on the same principle. If a master-servant relationship is established between two parties, the master (BCCI) can be held responsible for the acts of their servant (your coach). This concept helps in situations where individuals can't be identified as perpetrators, but the organization is still responsible. Think of it like taking Maggi for lunch - the brand (Maggi) can't be held accountable for an individual's cooking skills, but if their noodles somehow cause food poisoning, the company might still be liable.