Tort of Private Defence: Is It Really a Necessity?

I totally vibe with the dissenting judge in Mithu v State of Punjab (1983) - private defence is indeed a grey area. Many students think it's a straightforward "self-defence" law, but trust me, it's not that simple after all. In this famous case, the court debated if a defendant could use excessive force in self-defence, and ultimately, the majority ruled against it. My internship at a law firm made me realize how often private defence is misused in India's courts. Think about it - what if the person you're defending is actually the aggressor? It's a tough nut to crack, and the fact that it's an exception to the rule of no-causation makes it even more complicated. Can't say I entirely disagree with the dissenting judge's opinion - perhaps we need to revisit the concept of private defence in our courts.