The Unseen Link Between Trademark and Geographical Indications

ipr bar_exam advanced internship_learn

During my internship at a law firm, I chanced upon a fascinating case - F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Cipla Ltd (2006). The court ruled that the trademark "Valium" can coexist with the GI "Valium" even though the latter was not in use because a geographical indication by definition cannot be used as a trademark. What caught my attention was the distinction made between 'indications' and 'signs'. This subtlety is often overlooked but crucial for exam purposes. GI's are indications of source, not the trademark itself. This has a significant bearing on the exam questions related to co-existence and infringement.

0 comments

0 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.