The Outdated Concept of "Act of a Person of Unsound Mind

Okay, so I think IPC Section 84 needs a major reform. This provision says a person who is of unsound mind will not be criminally liable for acts done while he is so. But here's the thing - what actually constitutes 'unsound mind'? We're talking about 19th-century British law here. The provision requires the courts to determine whether the person was capable of understanding the nature and consequences of their actions, and whether they were capable of controlling their behavior.

In today's context, where mental health issues are being acknowledged and addressed more openly, this provision seems ridiculously outdated. How can we possibly expect a court to assess someone's mental state in a situation like this? It's a recipe for inconsistent verdicts and bias. Not to mention, it's a cop-out for the accused - no accountability, no justice.