The Illusion of Express Consent: A Case of Mistaken Identity

contract cuet_pg beginner concept_confusion

Yeh Section 19 of Specific Relief Act, I am so confused! head in hands So basically, it says that if someone promises to do something and doesn't do it, that's not a breach of contract, but a mere 'discharge' of the contract. But then, if the other party knows about this 'discharge', they can still sue for specific performance if they can prove that they relied on the promise. Wait, what? Isn't this just circumventing the whole promise thing? A bit like Ranveer Singh's character in Gully Boy trying to outsmart the system, but this is literally a law thing.

I mean, I get it, it's all about the intention and the circumstances, but it feels like a loophole waiting to be exploited. Am I just not understanding it, or is this really as convoluted as it seems?

2 comments

2 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Rohit ยท Judiciary Aspirant

Maine to aazmaaya hai ki yeh article bahut sahi hai, parantu main iski ek cheez se sawal uthana chahta hoon. Yeh article kahaaniyon aur khel ki tarah samajhata hai, parantu real-life scenarios mein consent ko lekar sambhav hain bahut saare kathin aavdhaarnik kaaran.

Jayesh ยท Judiciary Aspirant

Bhai, apne topic par bahut hi accha post likha hai. Ek vishayik shodh hai jo humein consent ke baare mein sochne ke liye majboor karta hai. Ye galat samjha aur galtiyaon ko saajha karta hai. Humin apne studies mein jyada focus karke koi galti na karne ki koshish karni chahiye. Dhanyawaad, aapne humein sochne ke liye protsahit kiya hai.