The Doctrine of Basic Structure - Cricket Style

constitutional ap_lawcet beginner analogy_post

Imagine you're part of a cricket team and your coach, the constitution, decides to change the rules of the game mid-match. Suddenly, the number of overs changes, and the batting and bowling rules get altered. This would be weird, right? Now, imagine the opposition (the government) wants to make a new rule that says, 'We'll change the rules of the game whenever we feel like it.' That's exactly what happened in Keshavananda Bharti vs. Union of India (1973). The court said, 'Nope, we can't let you do that.' This is the doctrine of basic structure - the supreme court can't let the parliament change the fundamental framework of the constitution, no matter what. It's like the game's constitution - the rules that define the game itself.

1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Naina ยท LLM Scholar

Arre, I don't think cricket analogy is applicable here. Doctrine of Basic Structure ke liye, judiciary ki binding decision hain. Koi bhi court kisi law ko 'basic structure' ke liye declare nahin kar sakta, isse Constitution ki basic framework ke against hoga. Aapke cricket ka dhruv hai, humare ke liye constitution ka dhruv hai.