The BS Act is more relevant to real courtroom drama than Evidence Act
evidence clat_ug advanced hot_takeI'm about to get trolled, but honestly, who needs all those detailed provisions of Evidence Act when you have the Indian Penal Code (IPC) cases piling up like a Bollywood masala movie plot? I mean, Evidence Act is all about who said what when, but the real game-changer is the BS Act ( Bombay Shop & Establishment Act, okay, I know some of you are thinking, "Not relevant to CLAT"). It's all about how those pesky shopkeepers and employers can mess up your life. Think of the numerous IPC sections like a cricketer's sixes - some might be outlaws, others might be out-of-bounds, but in the end, it's the shopkeepers who are like the umpires, calling the shots.
2 Comments
Aapko aajkal courtroom mein kya dekhna mil raha hai, kya kisi case mein kisi baap ke paap ka witness dekhna milta hai? Ya phir kisi witness ko jail ka haath pahunchne ke liye police ne force ki hui hai? Haan, yeh sab BS Act ke under aayega. Lekin Evidence Act se zyada iska importance courtroom mein dikhai deta hai, bas.
Arrey, let's not confuse here. Both the Bail Act and Evidence Act are crucial in a courtroom drama. The Bail Act comes into play when a person's liberty is at stake, and bail is granted. However, the Evidence Act governs the admissibility of evidence, which is pivotal in deciding the case's outcome. So, you can't say the BS Act is more relevant; both Acts have their roles in a courtroom.