Supreme Court's Order on Co-Owners' Dispute - A Lesson in Section 4 of the TP Act

property clat_ug advanced news_to_law

Sunil Kutty vs State of Kerala, 2024 - you guys must have read this one. So, couple of co-owners in a Kerala flat decided to sell their joint property without informing the third co-owner. The third guy, who owned 20% of the flat, claimed the sale was invalid as it was done without his consent. Our Supreme Court had to step in and say, 'Dekho, Section 4 of the Transfer of Property Act is very clear. You need co-owner's consent to transfer the property. If you don't take it, the deal is invalid.' Simple, ne? But do our co-owners learn? Nope. This case is a textbook example of Section 4 - you need co-owners' consent to transfer a joint property. Period.

1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Aditya ยท Legal Eagle

Main aazmaan hoon ki Supreme Court ki order pe itna emphasis karna zyada hai. Article hai, court ke orders ko implement karne ke liye section 4 ka reference karna zaroori hai hai. Lekin, court ki orders ko section 4 ke hisaab se hi nahin samajhna chahiye. Ismein court ki overall approach aur reasoning bhi importnant hai. Article mein is cheez ko samajhne ka jazbaa nahin aaya.