Social Media Influencer's Negligence: A Case of Omission

torts clat_pg beginner news_to_law

You must've seen the viral video of a popular social media influencer's 'accidental' livestream where she accidentally exposed her son's personal info and photos to millions. This incident raises eyebrows over the liability of influencers. This is a classic case of omission of duty under Section 49 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which states that if a person omits to perform a legal duty, they can be held liable for damages. Here, the influencer's duty to protect her son's privacy was breached, causing harm. This incident falls under the legal concept of 'Negligent Omission' or 'Negligenz im Verschulden' in common law jurisdictions. Can you think of the damages her son and family might claim?

2 comments

2 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Rahul ยท Law Student

Dekho, this case is very interesting. Agar Social Media Influencer kisi product ka promotion karte hain aur usmein kuch bhi sahi information nahi di aur kisi se nuksan hota hai, toh unki omission ka case aayega. Unka responsibility hai ki woh sahi information de. Unke liability ka pura analysis karna hoga, khud ki liability aur product company ki.

Kritika ยท LLB Aspirant

Bhai, this article highlights a crucial issue. Social media influencers often fail to disclose sponsored content, which can mislead their followers. This omission can lead to a breach of liability. The article suggests that courts should consider the principles of occupiers' liability to hold influencers accountable. It's a step in the right direction. However, we need to be cautious not to over-regulate, as it may stifle creativity. A balanced approach is necessary to protect consumers without stifling free speech.