Section 91 vs. Section 92: Kya hai iske beech ka actual faayda?
evidence general advanced questionMain socha tha ki Section 91 mein witness ko pehle ek baar call kiya ja sakta hai, lekin fir usse phir ek hi case mein ek bar phir bulaaya ja sakta hai. Lekin yeh bhi socha ki Section 92 mein bhi ek witness ka call kiya ja sakta hai. To kya hai iske beech ka faayda? Kya Section 91 sirf ek baar call ke liye hai ya phir bhi ek witness ko ek baar phir bulaaya ja sakta hai? Maine read kiya hai ki Section 91 mein ek witness ko pehle ek baar call kiya ja sakta hai aur phir bhi usse phir ek baar call kiya ja sakta hai, lekin koi limit nahi hai.
2 Comments
Maine socha hai, aap log kuch galat samajh rahe hain. Section 91 aur 92 dono hi kahaani mein hain, par faayda toh Section 91 ke paas hai. Yeh khaana khane ke liye permission diya hai, toh yeh hi sahi hai. Section 92 ka kaam aur hai, jiski zaroorat nahin.
Arre bhai, Section 91 vs Section 92 mein faayda kya hai? Toh yeh hai, Section 91 is direct transfer of property, jab ki Section 92 is kuch bhi nahi, bas ek sawal hai ki property ki kya value hai. Lekin agar court direct value nahi de sakta, toh Section 92 ka use karte hain, woh 6 mahine se kam value deta hai. So, direct transfer hota hai.