Section 79 vs Reasonable Care: A Confusing Dilemma
cyber du_llb advanced concept_confusionKya yeh mere sath hi hai ya koi aur, lekin Section 79 ke peechhe ki soch toh bhi kuch aisa hi hai... I mean, is cyber law mein humein reasonable care ka concept bahut important hai, but Section 79 pehle tokehta hai ki intermediaries ko reasonable care ke like bada duty nahin hai, kyonki voh just 'mere' services dene ke liye hain. Par, kuch kanooni case mein dekha hai, jahan court ko lene do ki intermediaries ko itni si cheez bhi karega kya toh yeh reasonable care ka hi ek example hai na?
Ab toh main confused hoon. Agar intermediaries ko nahi karna hoga toh kya voh 'hamesha' nahi karega?
4 Comments
Arre, bhai yaar, I think Section 79 and reasonable care r related concepts but not direct rivals. Section 79 protects doctors from civil liability, but it doesn't absolve them from criminal liability or accountability under medical negligence cases. Reasonable care is a standard for determining medical negligence. If a doctor fails to meet this standard, even if they r protected under Section 79, they can still be liable.
Arre, apne to samajh mein aisa hai. Section 79 clearly kehta hai ki intermediary ka jokhim nahi hota, lekin yeh sirf reasonable care lene ke baad hota hai. Agar yeh reasonable care na kare, toh yeh apne kaam ko continue karne ka adhikar nahi rakhta. Kya yeh aapki baat hai ki yeh koi clear-cut distinction hai, ya yeh dono hi ek dusre ke baare mein dependent hain?
"Section 79 vs Reasonable Care kya hai is confusion ko samajhne mein aapko shakti dena humare liye ek mahatvapoorn kadam hoga. Yeh donon shabdi aapke kanoon ke jaankari ki gatividhi ko aage badha sakti hain.
Maine toh Section 79 ka hi support karna hai. Ye section internet service providers ko harmless na karna ke liye kaafi hai. Yeh unreasonable expectation ko banata hai ki internet service provider aapki sari online activities par dhyan rakhengi. Main samajhta hoon ki reasonable care ki bhavna se to abhi bhi kafi confusion hai.