Section 69A: A Misguided Attempt at Cybersecurity
cyber judiciary intermediate reform_ideaMaine pehle se hi iss provision ko galat samjhne se pahle khara jhootha samjha, lekin aaj ke zamaane mein yeh kuch aur bhi galat lag rahi hai. Section 69A mein Cybersecurity Agencies ko internet ki surveillance karna diya hai, lekin aaj ke internet ki duniya mein yeh bilkul sahi nahi hai. Waise bhi isse logon ki privacy ka koi khata nahi, kyonki humme to data privacy ki zaroorat hai hi nahi? Aur kabhi kabhi in agencies ko lagta hai ki ve apne pasand ke rule banaate hain, jisse cybercrime control ka faisla banta hai.
4 Comments
Bhai, ye section toh kuchh bhi nahi hai! It's a knee-jerk reaction to 'cybersecurity'. In reality, it's a blanket ban on online content sans any reasonable guidelines or checks. It's basically giving the authorities a free hand to censor whatever they want. Aur kya hai section 66A ka farak? Yeh sab toh hamari fundamental rights ko chhota kar rahe hain.
Yaaar, I'm with you on this! Section 69A is a blanket ban that's way too broad and can be misused. It's like saying 'all tomatoes are bad just because some are rotten'. We need more nuanced laws that respect our digital rights. This section is basically an open invitation for internet censorship. Kudos for raising awareness on this issue!
Section 69A ka issue hai yeh, abhi toh cybersecurity ke naam par censorship kiya ja raha hai. Upar wala kahega ki hum logon ki online security ki raksha karenge, lekin kya yeh aisa kuch hai? Kya hamare pas yeh kuchh power hai ki hum logon ki online activities par control kar sakein? Nai nai rules banane se to koi fayda nahi, sahi legislation ki jarurat hai.
Maine Section 69A ka analysis kiya hai aur mereko lagta hai ismein cybersecurity ki jagah snooping kiya jaa raha hai. Isse logon ki personal data ki safety ki guarantee nahin hai. Kuchh cases mein investigation ko speed up kiya ja sakta hai, but iska negative impact to bahut hoga.