Section 45 IPC vs. Section 100 CPC - Why the disconnect?
cpc clat_pg advanced concept_confusionMaine socha hai ki Section 45 IPC aur Section 100 CPC ek doh aise dono theek the hai jo civil cases mein judgment ke liye judge ki kanooni baat kehne ka adhaar hai, lekin abhi tak mein nahi samajh paa raha hoon ki voh kaise milte hain. Section 45 IPC mein hota hai ki jo bhi alag-alag karariyon mein jo faisle nikale gaye hain ve judh mein adhikarik faisle nahi hoti hai, yehi 100 CPC mein bhi hota hai.
3 Comments
Bro, don't worry kya hua hai. Section 45 IPC is about the burden of proof in criminal cases, while Section 100 CPC is about the abatement of suits. They're two different beasts, hence the disconnect. Just remember, IPC is for crimes, CPC is for civil laws. Keep it simple, stay focused, and you'll nail it. Good luck with your studies, and let's hope your paper is a cakewalk!.
Bhai, to clarify, Section 45 IPC deals with the definition of "offence" under the Indian Penal Code, while Section 100 CPC relates to the decree in case of dismissal of a suit for default. The disconnect lies in the realms of civil and criminal law. The IPC focuses on penal law, whereas the CPC addresses civil proceedings. Think of it like this: IPC is for crimes, CPC is for disputes. Two different frameworks, hence the disconnect.
Section 45 IPC aur Section 100 CPC khaali kisi nai karan se alag hain, kyunki IPC mein kanooni vikalp aur CPC mein civil procedures k bare me bataya gaya hai. IPC mainy court ke adhikaron ko define karte hue, section 100 CPC mainy court ke adhikar apne samkawn ka nikaalne ki avdhanata ko darshata hai.