Section 45: Abettors are principals? Ab kya hua!
criminal clat_pg intermediate concept_confusionMaine socha, Section 45 mein kya kharaab hai. Yeh kaha hai ki jab someone aur someone else crime kar rahe hain, aur doosra akele se kuch nahi kar raha, phir bhi use principle kaha ja sakta hai. Lekin bas yeh nahi, agar akele use hamesha principle ke siva koi aur option nahi dikhayi gayi hai, phir bhi use principle kaha ja sakta hai. Ab kya hua, abettor ek principle ke tarah hi hai, ya phir woh kuch aur hai. Main yeh samjh nahin sakta. Aur court mein kya kehna hai, agar koi abettor hamesha principle ke siva koi aur option nahi dikhayi hai?
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Section 45 ka matlab yeh nahin hai ki abettors principal hain. Yeh to Section 109 ke sath hui. Agar abettor apne gyaat se karvai karti ho ya phir apne saathi ko kuch bhi karna hai, to woh principal ho jati hai. Iska matlab yeh hai ki abettor ko bhi wahi punishment milte hai, jiska principal ko milta hai.