Section 32 of Evidence Act doesn't require the accused to prove their defense is true
evidence clat_ug beginner agree_disagreeYeh kya baat hai, guys? Main to yahaan kuch dino se socha tha iska jo logic theek hi hai. Section 32 clearly states ki court akele se bhi defense ko reject kar sakta hai. Jaise, agar koi defense ho ki main ghar mein tha, to yeh statement pehle investigation karne ke baad pehle aayega. Aur agar prosecution ko prove karne ke liye enough evidence nahi hai, to court akele se bhi defense ko reject kar sakta hai. To, kyun hai koi zaroorat ki accused ko apne defense ko prove karne ke liye evidence batakar aaye? Iss logic se lagta hai ki akele Section 32 ki wajah se hi kuch cases kharaab ho jaati hain.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
"Agar aapka sawal hai kya Section 32 Evidence Act shikaayat karne wala kya karta hai, to mujhe lagta hai ki yeh sawal bhi uplabdh hai. Section 32 aapko yeh kehata hai ki yadi koi accused nay koi evidence dikhayi hai ki unka koi defense sach hai, toh court shikaayat karne wale ko prove karna hoga.