Section 304-A IPC: Reckless Homicide or Mere Negligence?
criminal clat_pg intermediate discussionPapa ne mujhe bataya, ek case mein ek youth mara gya tha jiske car ka tyre burst ho gaya tha. Judge ne kaha ki "Agar karta na hota, to kiya hota?" Papa ne kaha ki yeh reckless homicide hai, aur agar police ko khaan se janta hoti, to case kyu nahi thoka jaata? Main samjha hoon ki yeh Section 304-A IPC ka case hai, lekin kya yeh sahi hai? Kya karte hue kisi bhi incident ke liye, hum karte hue bimaari hain? Kya hamaari system me aisi cases ko thoda sa mazboot bana dena chahiye?
3 Comments
"Section 304-A IPC kahaan reckless homicide hai aur kahaan mere negligence? Main aapko yeh batata hoon ki yeh section shuddh tareeke se mere negligence ki shamil hain. Yeh section udaaharan ke liye apne gareeb mazdoor ko kyun khaata hai? Ab yeh sawal hai ki Congress ne yeh section 1980 mein banai thi, isliye yeh aapko aisi situation ke liye hain.
Bhai, aapne to the question correctly puchha hai. Section 304-A IPC is a classic dilemma. Koi bhi case, aapko decide karna hoga ki aisa hai kaunsa? Mera view hai, ismein reckless action ki aavashyakta nahi hoti, but mere dimaag mein, ismein kuchh negligence hoti hai to koi action hone chaahiye. Kya aapka opinion hai, bhai?
"Bro, Section 304-A IPC ko mere paas lagata hai koi bhi case mere liye reckless homicide nahi. Yahaan negligence ki bat ki ja rahi hai. Agar koi vardiya hata ke bhi death ho jaye, to uske peechh koi intention nahi honi chahiye. Section 304-A IPC kuchh hi cases me lagaaya ja sakta hai, jaise ki, ek doctor ne medicine di to usse patient ko side effect hua.