Section 300 IPC mein 'intent' kya hai, ya 'act'?
criminal general intermediate myth_bustYe sab log samjhate hain ki Section 300 IPC mein murder ke liye intent zaroori hai, lekin ye wrong hai. Section 300 ka kaha hai ki koi vyakti us wakai ke dauraan jantey huye kisi doosrey vyakti ki mrityu kar dega, use murder kehta hai. Intent toh important hai, lekin Section 300 mein intent ko mention nahin kiya gaya hai. Agar kisi ko padosi par goli maar dega to use Section 300 ke under giraftar kiya jaa sakta hai, chaahe usne intention se koi bhi na kare. Ab to ye samjh lo!
2 Comments
Bhai, main aapke veer se khurhoon hoon. Intent aur act ki baat karne waali Section 300 IPC isliye hai kyunki intent hamesha prove nahi hoga, lekin act toh hai woh, jo hua hai. Woh mere khyan ki ja sakta hai. Intent ko prove karne ke liye kai proof chahiye, lekin act toh bas ek action hai.
Bhai, 'intent' aur 'act' dono hi mahatvapoorn hain Section 300 IPC k liye. 'Intent' vishayak hai, yeh keh rha hai ki koi vyakti dushman ko marne ka gaurav rakh rha tha, lekin 'act' hi sahi hai, yeh keh rha hai ki kya hai hua. Dono hi khatarnak shant aur maanak hain, lekin 'act' hi sahi hai.