Section 29: Proof of Documents - A Relic of the Past
evidence clat_pg advanced reform_ideaYe, section 29 of Evidence Act aam to sham lag raha hai. Yeh kaha se bhi lagta hai ki yeh section mere time main hi aisa hi tha, lekin ab to lagta hai ki yeh mere time se behtar hai. Kya aapko pata hai? Is section mein kaha jaata hai ki jab koi document kisi officer ki copy lagta hai toh usse bina witness ke accept kiya ja sakta hai. Lekin, aaj kal ke times mein yeh to bahut confusing ho raha hai. Kya aapko nahin laga ki yeh koi sahi nahi hai? Aaj kal jo documents hain, woh to online hi bante hain, bas ek click aur vo documents create ho jate hain.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Ye toh theek kaha hai ki Section 29 kuch purana hai, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki iska upyog aaj bhi bahut zaroori hai. Yeh Section court ko documents ki authenticity ka proof maangti hai, aur yeh ek zaroori baat hai, especially abhi aaj kal cybercrime ka case kharaab hua hai toh. Iss section ko band karne se kya hoga?