Section 27 vs Section 31: Aaiye Kya Hua Hai Iska?
contract clat_pg intermediate concept_confusionMain toh phir se confuse hua hu Section 27 aur 31 ka. Ye do section ek doosre ki jagah kya keh rahe hain? Section 27 kehte hain ki aadharit aapko contract ki madad ke liye court ke paas jana padega, lekin Section 31 kehte hain ki kuchh maamlein aap court ke paas na jake bhi solved ho jate hain. Main toh nahi samajh paa raha hoon. Kya yeh dono section ek doosre ki pehli karni hain ya phir ye dono galat hain? Koi bata sakta hai ke aap Section 27 ke under court ke paas kya kehte hain?
3 Comments
Arre bhai, Section 27 aur Section 31 dono ke bare mein kai confusion hai. Section 27 ke under, jo bhi case ko delay karta hai vah fine pay karta hai. Lekin Section 31 ke under, court apne discretion se koi punishment decide karte hain. Yeh dono sections Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 main hai, lekin unka application aur scope alag-alag hai.
Doston, mujhe lagta hai ye do sections alag-alag scenario pe apply hoti hain. Section 27 aapko khule tareeke se sabit evidence diya hai, jabki Section 31 ko apply karte samay aapko prove karni padti hai ki accused ne free will se confession diya hai ya nahi. Iske alawa, jo bhi case hai, prosecution ko show karna hai ki confession sachchi hai ya nahi.
Arre bhai, Section 27 aur Section 31 ke beech aapko confusion hai toh main kuch clear karta hoon. Section 27 IPC mein khel ya khel ka uddeshya se pankhde ki pehchaan hai toh aise koi bhi kaam aapne aap se karna sahayoggatah hai jo aapke liye apni jaankari ka upyog karein.