Section 125 CrPC v/s Satiyaprakash Singh v/s State of M.P. (2014)
crpc_bnss general advanced questionBhai, kya yeh sabhi confusion hai. Papa ne mujhe section 125 CrPC ki kahaani sunayi thi, yeh hai kuchh baat jaaniye. Woh kaha the, section 125 main court husband ko apne patni ko maintenance dene ke liye khatra deti hai. Lekin ab yeh Satiyaprakash Singh case sunkar, main to confuse ho gaya. Inhone yeh case court main lagaya ki kaha hai, agar husband ko apne patni ko maintenance dena padta hai, to yeh unki property ka upyog karega ya fir inki property ko auction karke dena padega.
2 Comments
Maine ye case study kiya hai aur yeh mujhe lagta hai ki SC nay Section 125 CrPC ki interpretation me sahi kadam uthaya hai. Satiyaprakash Singh case me, court ne saamanya sabhyata aur human rights ka dhyaan rakhkar order 125 CrPC ka implementation kiya. Inke hisaab se order 125 CrPC ka maana hi badh jayega.
Yaar, to iska sawal bahut saara time pehle aaya tha. To, CrPC Section 125 ka matalab hai alimony ya mahila ke liye vridhajanak rakhne ke liye paise. Satiyaprakash Singh ka case hai, jahaan SC ne kaha ki Section 125 ki sthiti hai, magar iska upyog sirf us mahila ke liye hai jo apne pati se alag ho gayi hai.