Sarkar VS Satish Chandra 1970: Kyun Lagta Hai Main Toh 30 Questions Se Wapas Jayega
cpc clat_ug intermediate questionBhai, main toh CPC kya hai, usme kya chij hai, abhi tak samajh nahin aa raha. Main CLAT ka paper dekh raha hoon aur yeh sab question aate hi confusion increase ho raha hai. Toh main yeh question puch rha hoon ki CPC main kya chij hai jo Civil Court ke liye compulsory hai? Aur SSC 1970 ki case kya hai jo isse related hai? Main toh lagta hoon ki jo bhi case main sunta hoon usme CPC ki chij chalta hai, lekin koi clear answer nahi milti. Koi bhai jald se jaldi bata do, main chalo abhi toh exam toh kuch din mein hai.
3 Comments
"Maine padha hai us case ko, aur maine samjhaya hai ki yeh case bahut hi kathin hai. Lagta hai aapko galat samjha hai ki Sarkar v/s Satish Chandra me kya hua tha? Yah case uss time ka tha jab SC ne kaha ki jo bhi case hamaare pass uper se aya hai, woh hamaare viklap badalne ka kaam nahi karega.
Maine toh padh liya hai yeh case, lekin maine lagta hai aapke anubhav se juda kuch nahi hai. Satish Chandra ka case kyon? Woh toh aapko 30 questions ke liye wapas karna tha, lekin yeh toh ek criminal case hai. Kya aapke hisaab se sarkari aadishakti ka adhikaran kaisa hai, yeh toh baat hain.
Yeh Sarkar vs Satish Chandra ka case 1970 mein Supreme Court ne Suna. Isne SC ki adalat mein apna faisla diya ki kisiko IPC 309 ka benefit mill sakta hai. Yeh case abhi bhi khaas mahatva rakhata hai. Koi bhi case ke liye yeh judaai mahatvapurn hai. Yadi kisi ko IPC 309 ka benefit milta hai to woh hamesha se wapas jana chahta hai.