Sameer v. State of Maharashtra and Marbury v. Madison - Kyaa Hai Aapka Khayal?
constitutional mh_cet_law intermediate doubtYaar samajh nahi aaya. Kya difference hai 2 cases ke beech? Sameer v. State of Maharashtra (Bom HC, 1980) aur Marbury v. Madison (US SC, 1803). Dono cases mein Court ke power ke bare mein discussion thi. Sameer case mein, Bombay HC ne isse Article 226 ka support kiya, kya ke iss Article ki madad se, High Court ko power hai isse cancel karne par kanoon ke anusaar action lena. Lekin, kya yehi kaha hai Marbury v. Madison case mein? Unhone Supreme Court ki power ki baat ki, kya ke iss Court ko apna decision execute karne ka power hai. Kyun yeh sab samajh nahi aaya?
2 Comments
Maine socha, yeh dono kasee judicial review ke maamle mein similar lagte hai. Lekin, agar aapka dhyaan hoga, to Marbury v. Madison America ki constitution ko judicial oversight pradaan karne ki purana ladaai hai, jabki Sameer v. State Maharashtra ek modern Indian case hai, jahaan SC ne Article 21 ko strong karke fundamental rights ki raksha ki hai. Yeh do cases alag-alag hain, sirf judicial review ke liye hi nahi.
"Arre, ye dono ke court decisions sabse pramukh hai constitutionality aur judiciary ki adhikar ko seekhne ke liye. Maine padha hai ki Marbury v. Madison mein U.S. Supreme Court ka pratham prasiddh court decision aaya tha, jisne judiciary ki adhikar ko established kiya. Sameer v. State of Maharashtra kisi aur case ka reference hai, lekin maine padha hai ismein kuchh adhikar ki galtiyon ka mention hai.