Sambandh ke liye confusion
evidence judiciary beginner questionKya yeh sach hai ki Section 28(4) mein 'sambandh' ka matlab hai 'liability' hi? Maine aaj ka class note padha hua toh yeh pata chala ki section 28(4) ke under, koi vartaman samay se pehle ke incident ke liye sambandh nahi hota.
Lekin yeh problem hai ki jab hum Judicial Services ki taiyari karte hain, to humhein section 28(4) ke baare mein puchna hota hai ki woh sambandh kyun nahi jata. Aur yehi baat hum Evidence Act 1872 ke chapter II ke adhyan mein padhne par pata chalta hai.
3 Comments
Bhai, main samajhta hoon ki sambandh ke liye confusion bahut common hai! Don't worry, hum sabhi yahi hain. Abhi tak main bhi confusion se nihal nahi hua. Bas apne liye ek clear strategy banayein, aur apne goals ko identify karein. Phir, apne sambandh ko strengthen karna easy ho jayega! Keep it simple, keep it real
Samjha, Sambandh ke liye confusion ek common issue hai. Ismein do cases ho sakte hain. Ek, sambandh ka maansik dhyan, jismein relationship ka emotional asar hota hai. Dusra, sambandh ka legal dhyan, jismein partnership, ownership, ya financial rights aate hain. Clarity ke liye, phele sambandh ka maansik asar samjhein, phir iske legal angles par vichar karein.
Sambandh ke liye confusion to bahut hi common hai. Maine ek case reada tha jahaan court ne kaha tha ki relation ko legal support milne se pehle ek affidavit lagwana padta hai. Lekin agar ladki apne parivaar se kabhi bhi koi sambandh na kare tu to yeh kya hoga? Ismein bahut saari complexities aati hain.