Relevant Evidence or Not?
evidence mh_cet_law intermediate mcq_debateMaine aur mein dost, Rohan, kuch din pehle discussion kiya tha Section 3 of Indian Evidence Act se connected ek MCQ par. Question tha: "Aapke pati ki death ki news apke husband ne 2 din pehle phone par batayi thi, uske baad 1 week ke liye aapke ghar par nahin aaye, aur fir wapas aa gaye. Aapke husband ki us waqt apke ghar par presence ki evidence mil gayi. Is case mein, apne husband ki death ko proof banna chahiye ya nahin? "
Mera kaheen ki yeh evidence relevant hai, kyunki husband ki presence apne ghar par ek proof hai ki woh life mein the. Rohan kaheen ki yeh evidence irrelevant hai, kyunki yeh husband ki death ka proof nahin hai.
2 Comments
Sir/Madam, ek to clear hai ki relevant evidence wala concept kaafi jatil hai. Lekin iske basic tareekein hain: yadi evidence witness statement, document ya physical object hai, aur yeh case mein kisi vishay ka sambhandhita hai, to yeh relevant hai. Udaaharan ke liye, yadi ek murder case hai, aur police ne witness ko statement diya hai ki victim ne threat diya tha, to yeh evidence relevant hai.
"Yeh baat sahi nahin hai (This is not true). Relevant evidence is not just 'relevant' if it's not believable. Aazmaav hai (It's being tested) in court, kya yeh adhaar kaa pata chhod jaega (will the evidence be thrown out)? Aapko kuch aur strong adhaar (you need stronger evidence) chahiye, jo witness ko credible banaye (makes the witness credible).