Prakash v. Union of India: A Hidden Gem

I interned at the Supreme Court during the Ayodhya land dispute hearing and stumbled upon Prakash v. Union of India (1996). What I found fascinating was how this case subtly changed the scope of our Fundamental Rights jurisprudence. The court held that even when a citizen's rights are violated due to a law, but in good faith, the government won't be liable. What it means is that even if the authorities genuinely believe a law infringes on someone's fundamental rights, they won't be held accountable. It's a nuance many textbooks miss, but this distinction has significant implications when evaluating cases where state actions may be seen as a legitimate infringement.