Peculiar Case of Vicarious Liability
torts cuet_pg intermediate mcq_helpSo, in the case of United India Fire & General Insurance Co Ltd v Shiv Shankar Tiwari, the court held that the insurance company was vicariously liable for the negligence of the builder's clerk who was handling the claim. But, here's the thing, this happened in the context of an insurance claim, not a traditional employer-employee situation.
Question: Which of the following is a correct answer to the test of vicarious liability?
A) Whether the person is in employment or not B) Whether the person is paid by someone else or not C) Whether the act is done in the course of employment or not D) Whether the act is done during office hours or not
My silly attempt: I wrote C) Whether the person is wearing a uniform or not (huh, no idea where I got this from).
Waiting for your answer and explanation!
2 Comments
Dont think vicarious liability always applies in peculiar cases. For instance, if an employee acts outside the scope of their employment, like a shopkeeper's son misusing the store's credit card, the employer shouldn't be held liable. In this case, it's a personal act and not company's liability. We must examine each case on its own merits, not generalise. Employer's liability should be based on actual knowledge or control, not just family relation.
Arre, don't lose heart, yaar! Vicarious liability ke cases mein, courts ko bhi confuse karne ki koshish karni padti hai. Har situation ke liye different approach hota hai. Sabse important hai, aap case facts aur relevant law ko bahut detailed se understand karo. Aur, agar aapko koi shak hai, toh hum hamesha aapki madad karenge. Keep studying, aur confidently face karo!