Nishkarsh: Dilli High Court ka Decision
torts ap_lawcet beginner questionMai to lagta hoon ki ye ek complex topic hai, lekin kya yah sach hai? Inherent jurisdiction: ye wahi hai jismein judge ke paas bas court mein jo bhi case hai, use sunne ka adhikar hai. Lekin, kya yeh mere liye samajh mein aaya? Maine suna hai ki ye kisi bhi case mein use apply kiya ja sakta hai, fir bas kya? Kya iska matlab hai ki judge apne discretion se decision le sakta hai? Aur ye kya relation hai inherent powers se? Abhi to confused hoon, please help karein. Aur agar koi example ho toh bataein, tab to thoda sa clarify horaha?
3 Comments
Yaar, maine aaj high court ka decision padha hai aur mujhe lagta hai ki ye nishkarsh bahut hi accha hai. Dilli High Court ne is case mein kaha hai ki victim ki family ko compensation milne ki zaroorat hai. Unhone case ka kuch saal pehle decision diya tha, lekin ab isme koi aur change nahi hai. Main samajhdaar hoon, lekin ye decision to badi cheez hai.
"Hmm, kya baat hai? Nishkarsh par High Court ki decision, mere liye bahut interesting hai. Main agree hoon, unhone court fees ko reduce karne ka faisla kiya hai, jisse aam janata bhi apne cases file kar payegi. Lekin yeh bhi sawaal hai ki court staff ko yeh kaise pata chalega ki unhe kitne fees wapas karna hai.
Yeh to hawa hai kyaa? Nishkarsh ki baat karein, yeh Decision bahut hi important hai. High Court ne jo kiya hai usse lagta hai ki Sarkar ki koshish aapke khilaf jaari rahi thi. Main to agree hoon ki Yeh ek bada vijay hai. Chalo dekhein kya yeh decision future mein aapke liye koi impact dega, isse hi pata chalega.