Mujhe lagta hai k Section 62 ki interpretation me problem a rahi hai

property judiciary advanced concept_confusion

I'm having trouble with Section 62 of the Transfer of Property Act. Maine socha tha if a lease is given for a part of a property, then the lessor only has to give quiet possession for that part, but now I'm not so sure. If the lessee has been wronged in some way, can he still claim damages from the lessor? Or does the lessor only have to compensate for the part of the property that was not given in quiet possession? Maine socha tha it was simple, lekin ab ye don't seem so straightforward. Is it just me or is this interpretation a bit confusing?

1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Ravi ยท Bar Exam Prep

Main bhi samajhta hoon ki Section 62 ki interpretation me dikkat hoti hai. Aapko iska sabse bada mudda yeh laga sakta hai ki court ka kya role hota hai share transfer ke case me. Main yeh soch raha hoon ki court ko apne decision me kya parameters consider karna chahiye. Kya aap apne kya vichar share kare?