Mens Rea in Indian Jurisprudence
constitutional mh_cet_law intermediate internship_learnSo yaar, I was at the Bombay HC, and I was reading up on the Kengal Hanumayya case (AIR 1951 SC 226). Now, it's an old case but what I found out that wasn't in my textbook was that our SC never precisely defined 'moral guilt' or 'mens rea' in Indian jurisprudence. It's like, our Penal Code has this whole doctrine of 'actus reus' and 'mens rea' thing going on, but when it comes to actual judgments, it's like, the court never explicitly stated what constitutes mens rea.
Now, in MH CET Law context, this is super important because we often get questions on the subject, and I realized that our textbooks just gloss over this part.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Yaar, don't worry about the complexities of mens rea, it's just a concept! You can't just mug up, you gotta understand the rationale behind it. Remember, mens rea is the 'guilty mind' behind a crime, so it's all about intent and knowledge. Just go through the cases of Mulla and Salmond, you'll get the hang of it. Trust me, it's doable, keep practicing and you'll nail it!