MCQ: "Witness Statements as Evidence
evidence du_llb advanced mcq_helpSection 60 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 kya kehta hai? (What does Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 say?)
Yeh MCQ aapko test karta hai: Pehle dekhna padega ki statement kis prakaar ki hee hai. A. Witness ko statement dekhne ke baad hi valid hoti hai. B. Statement ko court mein produce karna jaruri hai. C. Witness statement ko apne statement ke sath match karna jaruri hai. D. Witness statement ko koi specific ground par reject nahi kisha jata hai.
Mujhe lagta hai ki sahi answer hai C. (Mujhe wrong laga but now I think I am correct)
Aapka jawab kya hai?
2 Comments
Chill, this is a straightforward question. Think of witness statements as secondary evidence. They can be used to corroborate or contradict the primary evidence. Just remember, witness statements can be written, video or audio recordings, or even just a witness's verbal statement in court. They add depth to the case, but are not conclusive on their own. Keep it simple, and you're good to go!
Arre bhai, main nahin mante. Section 3 of Evidence Act 1872 clearly baata hai ki witness statement ko evidence ke roop mein swikar karna hai, lekin iska condition hai ki witness ko ek witness mein accept kiya ja sakta hai. Lekin yeh koi jahil nai hai ki witness ko ko kehna hai ki woh case mein shamil tha, isliye statement ko evidence ke roop mein nahin maana ja sakta.